54⋅(51)4=?
\( 5^4\cdot(\frac{1}{5})^4=\text{?} \)
\( 5^4-(\frac{1}{5})^{-3}\cdot5^{-2}=\text{?} \)
\( \frac{10^4\cdot0.1^{-3}\cdot10^{-8}}{1000}=\text{?} \)
\( \frac{z^{8n}}{m^{4t}}\cdot c^z=\text{?} \)
\( ((\frac{1}{5})^2)^?:5=125 \)
This problem can be solved using the Law of exponents power rules for a negative power, power over a power, as well as the power rule for the product between terms with identical bases.
However we prefer to solve it in a quicker way:
To this end, the power by power law is applied to the parentheses in which the terms are multiplied, but in the opposite direction:
Since in the expression in the problem there is a multiplication between two terms with identical powers, this law can be used in its opposite sense.
Since the multiplication in the given problem is between terms with the same power, we can apply this law in the opposite direction and write the expression as the multiplication of the bases of the terms in parentheses to which the same power is applied.
We continue and simplify the expression inside of the parentheses. We can do it quickly if inside the parentheses there is a multiplication between two opposite numbers, then their product will give the result: 1, All of the above is applied to the problem leading us to the last step:
We remember that raising the number 1 to any power will always give the result: 1, which means that:
Summarizing the steps to solve the problem, we obtain the following:
Therefore, the correct answer is option b.
1
We'll use the law of exponents for negative exponents:
Let's apply this law to the problem:
When we apply the above law of exponents to the second term from the left,
Next, we'll recall the law of exponents for power of a power:
Let's apply this law to the expression we got in the last step:
When we apply the above law of exponents to the second term from the left and then simplify the resulting expression,
Let's continue and recall the law of exponents for multiplication of terms with the same base:
Let's apply this law to the expression we got in the last step:
When we apply the above law of exponents to the second term from the left and then simplify the resulting expression,
From here we can notice that we can factor the expression by taking out the common factor 5 from the parentheses:
When we also used the law of exponents for multiplication of terms with the same base mentioned earlier, but in the opposite direction:
To notice that:
Let's summarize the solution so far, we got that:
Therefore the correct answer is answer C.
First let's write the problem and convert the decimal fraction in the problem to a simple fraction:
Next
a. We'll use the law of exponents for negative exponents:
b. Note that the number 1000 is a power of the number 10:
Let's apply the law of exponents from 'a' and the understanding from 'b' to the problem:
When we applied the law of exponents from 'a' to the term inside the parentheses of the middle term in the fraction's numerator, and applied the understanding from 'b' to the fraction's denominator,
Next, let's recall the law of exponents for power of a power:
And we'll apply this law to the same term we dealt with until now in the expression we got in the last step:
When we applied the above law of exponents to the middle term in the numerator carefully, since the term in parentheses has a negative exponent, we used parentheses, then simplified the resulting expression,
Now note that we can reduce the middle term in the fraction's numerator with the fraction's denominator, this is possible because multiplication exists between all terms in the fraction's numerator, so let's reduce:
Let's summarize the solution steps so far, we got that:
Let's continue and recall the law of exponents for multiplication of terms with identical bases:
Let's apply this law to the expression we got in the last step:
Now let's apply again the law of exponents for negative exponents mentioned in 'a' above:
When in the third step we calculated the numerical result of raising 10 to the power of 4 in the fraction's denominator, and in the next step we converted the simple fraction to a decimal fraction,
Let's summarize the solution steps so far, we got that:
Therefore the correct answer is answer a.
Let's start by emphasizing that this problem requires a different approach to applying the laws of exponents and is not as straightforward as many other problems solved so far. We should note that it's actually a very simplified expression, however, to understand which of the answers is correct, let's present it in a slightly different way,
Let's recall two of the laws of exponents:
a. The law of exponents raised to an exponent, but in the opposite direction:
b. The law of exponents applied to fractions, but in the opposite direction:
We'll work onthe two terms in the problem separately, starting with the first term on the left:
Note that both in the numerator and denominator, the number we are given in the exponents is a multiple of 4. Therefore, using the first law of exponents (in the opposite direction) mentioned above in a', we can represent both the term in the numerator and the term in the denominator as terms with an exponent of 4:
First we see the exponents as a multiple of 4, and then we apply the law of exponents mentioned in a', to the numerator and denominator.
Next, we'll notice that both the numerator and the denominator are have the same exponent, and therefore we can use the second law of exponents mentioned in b', in the opposite direction:
We could use the second law of exponents in its opposite direction because the terms in the numerator and denominator of the fraction have the same exponent.
Let's summarize the solution so far. We got that:
Now let's stop here and take a look at the given answers:
Note that similar terms exist in all the answers, however, in answer a' the exponent (in this case its numerator and denominator are opposite to the expression we got in the last stage) is completely different from the exponent in the expression we got (that is - it's not even in the opposite sign to the exponent in the expression we got).
In addition, there's the coefficient 4 which doesn't exist in our expression, therefore we'll disqualify this answer,
Let's now refer to the proposed answer d' where only the first term from the multiplication in the given problem exists and it's clear that there's no information in the problem that could lead to the value of the second term in the multiplication being 1, so we'll disqualify this answer as well,
If so, we're left with answers b' or c', but the first term:
in them, is similar but not identical, to the term we got in the last stage:
The clear difference between them is in the exponent, which in the expression we got is positive and in answers b' and c' is negative,
This reminds us of the law of negative exponents:
Before we return to solving the problem let's understand this law in a slightly different, indirect way:
If we refer to this law as an equation (and it is indeed an equation for all intents and purposes), and multiply both sides of the equation by the common denominator which is:
we'll get:
Here we remember that any number can be made into a fraction by writing it as itself divided by 1 , we applied this to the left side of the equation, then we multiplied by the common denominator and to know by how much we multiplied each numerator (after finding the common denominator) we asked the question "by how much did we multiply the current denominator to get the common denominator?".
Let's see the result we got:
meaning that are reciprocal numbers to each other, or in other words:
is reciprocal to-(and vice versa).
We can apply this understanding to the problem if we also remember that the reciprocal number to a fraction is the number gotten by swapping the numerator and denominator, meaning that the fractions:
are reciprocal fractions to each other- which makes sense, since multiplying them will give us 1.
And if we combine this with the previous understanding, we can conclude that:
meaning that raising a fraction to the power of negative one will give a result that is the reciprocal fraction, gotten by swapping the numerator and denominator.
Let's return to the problem and apply these understandings. First we'll briefly review what we've done already:
We dealt with the first term from the left from the problem:
and after dealing with it using the laws of exponents we got that it can be represented as:
Then after disqualifying answers a' and d' for the reasons mentioned earlier, we wanted to show that the term we got in the last stage:
is identical to the first term in the multiplication of terms in answers b' -c':
Now after we understood that raising a fraction to the power of will swap between the numerator and denominator, meaning that:
we can return to the expression we got for the first term in the multiplication , and present it as a term with a negative exponent and in the denominator of the fraction:
We applied the aforementioned understanding inside the parentheses and presented the fraction as the reciprocal fraction to the power of and in the next stage we applied the law of exponents raised to an exponent:
to the expression we got, then we simplified the expression in the exponent,
If so, we proved that the expression we got in the last step (the first expression in the problem) is identical to the first expression in the multiplication in answers b' and c',
We'll continue then and focus the choosing between these options for the second term in the problem.
The second term in the multiplication in the problem is:
Let's return to the proposed answers b' and c' (which haven't been disqualified yet) and note that actually only the second term in the multiplication in answer b' is similar to this term (and not in answer c'), except that it's in the denominator and has a negative exponent while in our case (the term in the problem) it's in the numerator (see note at the end of solution) and has a positive exponent.
This will again remind us of the law of negative exponents, meaning we'll want to present the term in the problem we're currently dealing with, as having a negative exponent and in the denominator, we'll do this as follows:
Here we present the term in question as having a negative exponent , using the multiplication laws, and then we applied the law of negative exponents:
Carefully - because the expression we're dealing with now has a negative sign (indicated by an underline , both in the law of exponents here and in the last calculation made)
Let's summarize:
And therefore the correct answer is answer b'.
Note:
When we see "the number in the numerator" when there's no fraction, it's because we can always refer to any number as a number in the numerator of a fraction if we remember that any number divided by 1 equals itself , meaning, we can always write a number as a fraction by writing it like this:
and therefore we can actually refer to as a number in the numerator of a fraction.
Let us begin by addressing the given problem as an equation:
Therefore, we shall replace the question mark with an x and proceed to solve it:
Remember that dividing by a certain number is equivalent to multiplying by its inverse, so we will rewrite the given equation bearing this in mind:
Let's briefly discuss the solution technique:
Generally speaking the goal when solving exponential equations is to achieve a situation where there is a term on each of the two sides of the equation so that both sides have the same base. In such a situation we can unequivocally state that the power exponents on both sides of the equation are equal, and thus solve a simple equation for the unknown.
Mathematically, we will perform a mathematical manipulation (according to the laws of equation manipulation) on both sides of the equation. Or we will concentrate on the development of one of the sides of the equation with the help of power rules and algebra in order to reach the following situation:
when Algebraic expressions ( functions of the unknown ) that can also exclude the unknowns () that we are trying to find in the problem, which is the solution to the equation,
It is then stated that:
and we solve the simple equation that we obtained.
We return to solving the equation in the given problem:
In solving this equation, various power rules are used:
a. Power property with negative exponent:
b. Power property for a power of an exponent raised to another exponent:
Our initial goal is to simplify the terms of the equation, that is, "eliminate" fractions and roots (if there are any in the problem, there are none here)
To do this, we will start by dealing with the fraction on the left side of the equation:
That is, both the fraction inside the parenthesis and the fraction outside the parenthesis, this is done with the help of the power rule for a negative exponent specified in A above. We then represent this fraction as a term with a negative power and in the next step we apply the power rule for a power of an exponent raised to another exponent specified in B above. We then are able to remove the parentheses starting from the inner parenthesis to the outer ones. This is shown below step by step:
When we carry out the development of the left side of the equation as described above, we initially apply the power rule for a negative exponent mentioned above in A.
In the following steps we apply the power rule for a power of an exponent raised to another exponent as mentioned above in B. We remove the parentheses: starting from the inner parenthesis to the outer. In the last step we simplify the expression in the power exponent on the left side of the equation,
c. Later we remember the power property for multiplying terms with identical bases:
Thus we apply this law to the left side of the equation that we obtained in the last step.
In the first step we apply the aforementioned power law to the product between members with identical bases mentioned above in C and in the following steps we simplify the expression in the power exponent on the left side,
Next, we seek to obtain the same base on both sides of the equation, the best way to achieve this is by decomposing each of the numbers in the problem into prime factors (using powers as well), you will notice that the number 125 is a power of the number 5, that is:
This is the presentation (factorization) of the number 125 using its prime factor, which is the number 5.
So we return to the equation we obtained in the previous step and replace this number with its decomposition into prime factors:
We have reached our goal, we have obtained an equation in which both sides have terms with the same base, therefore we can state that the power exponents of the terms on both sides are equal, and in order solve the resulting equation for the unknown, we proceed as follows:
We will continue to solve the resulting equation by isolating the unknown on the left side. We can achieve this in an usual way, by moving the sections and dividing the final equation by the unknown's coefficient:
In the first step we simplify the equation by moving the sides, remembering that when a term is moved its sign changes, then we complete the isolation by nullifying dividing both sides of the equation by its coefficient. In the last steps, we simplify the expression obtained by reducing the fractions,
We have thus solved the given equation. Below is a brief step by step summary of the solution:
Therefore, the correct answer is option a.
Which value is greater?
\( \big (\frac{x}{y}\big)^{-7}\cdot\frac{y}{x}\cdot\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)^{-2}=\text{?} \)
\( \frac{2^{-4}\cdot(\frac{1}{2})^8\cdot2^{10}}{2^3}=\text{?} \)
\( \frac{2^3}{3^2}\cdot3^{-2}\cdot\sqrt[4]{81}=\text{?} \)
Which value is greater?